I recently upgraded my machine from XP to Windows 7 and in doing so did a full format. To celebrate a clean slate, I decided I would finally give Google Chrome 2.0 a shot and use it for the first two weeks to see if I liked it better than Firefox 3.5. Here are my findings:
Speed: This was my main reason for wanting to switch. I'd heard about Chromes amazing start up speed, and it didn't disappoint. In my personal testing on an AMD Phenom 9750 2.4 Ghz quad core with 4 GB of RAM, Chrome started about twice as fast as Firefox and loaded pages at about the same rate. While this is only a few seconds shaved off total browsing time, Chrome does feel quite zippy in everything it does.
Adrian Kingsley Hughes from ZDNet has benchmarked Internet Explorer 8, Firefox 3.5 and 3.0, Safari 4, Opera 10 (alpha!) and Chrome 2.0 browsers using SunSpider, V8 benchmarks. These are her findings.
I will say this: Chrome needs some major work in rendering flash files. It is slow, and lags. This might be Adobe's fault, and hopefully they can get their game together. In the end, this category still goes hands ...